|

| Bulletin #09-07 |
Thursday, March 12, 2009 |
- Click here to download a printable copy of the bulletin (PDF format).
- Click here to visit the archives for past issues.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
Because
there is not a lot of money to go around this year, legislators are paying a lot
of attention to other issues, including many that impact local governments. So
far this year, numerous bills have been introduced to update the state’s
annexation laws, force city and county officials to comply with the state Ethics
Act, and change public notice requirements for local governments, among others.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BILL ON THE MOVE
A revised version of
H148 (Congestion Relief/Intermodal
Transport Fund) received a favorable report from the House Transportation
Committee on March 11 and has been referred to the House Finance Committee. The
bill, sponsored by Reps. Becky Carney (Mecklenburg), Lucy Allen (Franklin),
Deborah Ross (Wake) and Bill McGee (Forsyth), gives certain counties or
transportation authorities the ability to levy a one-half cent sales tax for
transportation purposes and gives all other counties a quarter-cent sales tax to
be used for transportation. The tax is not applicable to food. For the
individual county, either the county or a municipality within that county must
operate a public transportation system before a county can attempt to implement
the additional sales tax. For the multi-county special districts, all counties
within the district must agree to put the referendum on the ballot before it can
proceed. The referendum must pass in each individual county before an authority
can implement the tax. Certain criteria, as specified under Articles 26 and 27
in Chapter 160A of the General Statutes, must be met before counties can form a
regional transportation authority.
ANNEXATION CHANGES PROPOSED IN SEVERAL
BILLS
Annexation
was on the minds of many legislators this week, as three new bills proposing
changes to the state’s annexation laws surfaced – two in the Senate and one in
the House.
S472 (Annexation Changes), sponsored by Sen. Tony Rand
(Cumberland), the Senate majority leader, would make several changes to the
state’s annexation laws. Among the changes, the bill adjusts the small
municipality population threshold from 5,000 to 10,000 and expands requirements
on financial effects of annexation analysis. It also allows a “distressed”
community to be annexed if 75 percent of the “resident households” sign a
petition requesting annexation. This would allow low-income areas to receive
municipal services. The bill gives priority consideration to municipalities for
state grants to construct water-sewer systems for newly annexed low-income
residents. It allows a “doughnut hole” type of annexation but also tightens the
“balloon string” type of annexation by prohibiting annexations that use a street
or a street right-of-way to connect to an outlying area. The bill sets June 30
as the date for all annexations after adoption of an annexation ordinance, part
of the Association’s legislative goal on annexation, and gives all affected
property owners additional time to request an extension to pay for the cost of
the water/sewer service. It also includes a new section that allows a
municipality to enter into an agreement with a property owner in which the owner
agrees to receive the water/sewer services in exchange for not protesting the
annexation. Municipalities will allow the property owners up to 20 years to pay
off the cost.
H524
(Annexation – Omnibus Changes), sponsored by Reps. Bruce Goforth (Buncombe),
Paul Luebke (Durham), Earl Jones (Guilford) and Edgar Starnes (Caldwell), makes
many of the same changes noted above, but also adds several other restrictions
that would make it more difficult for municipalities to annex an area. The bill
increases density standards from 1.0 persons per square acre to 2.5 persons per
square acre, increases from 60 to 65 percent the “total number of lots and
tracts in the area at the time of annexation … used for residential, commercial,
industrial, institutional or governmental purposes” and requires that at least
60 percent of the area to be annexed is subdivided into lots of two acres or
less (was three acres or less). The bill also requires that a subdivision or
neighborhood can not be split by an annexation and adds to the public notice
requirements.
S494
(Annexation/Meaningful Services and Oversight), sponsored by Sen. Larry Shaw
(Cumberland), requires cities to prove that “meaningful” services can only be
provided by annexation and asks for great detail in how water/sewer services
will be provided. The bill allows the county Board of Commissioners set the date
of the public hearing and, if objections are raised at the hearing, gives the
county commissioners the authority to ask for a public referendum.
BILLS OF INTEREST
The Association has created a section on its Web site to track bills of interest to county officials. Visit www.ncacc.org/legislation/about.html for updates on key legislation, including the bills listed below.
|
Bill: |
HB382 |
|
Sponsors: |
Wainwright (D12); Farmer-Butterfield (D24); Martin (D34) |
|
Title: |
AUTHORIZE VOLUNTARY MEDICAL REGISTRY PROGRAM |
|
Related: |
2009:SB258 |
|
Status: |
03/10/2009 – House Committee On Judiciary III
|
|
Comments: |
The bill asks the state emergency management program to
establish a model registry for use by cities and counties to identify
medically fragile persons who would be in need of special assistance
during an emergency or disaster. Any health information obtained would
be considered confidential and would not be covered under public
information statutes. It authorizes cities and counties to coordinate
the voluntary registration of functionally and medically fragile
persons. The changes are part of a series of recommendations from the
Joint Select Committee on Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management
Recovery. The bill received a favorable report from the House Health
Committee on March 10 and has been re-referred to the House Committee on
Judiciary III. |
|
Bill: |
SB447 |
|
Sponsors: |
Hoyle (D43) |
|
Title: |
NO MONETARY EXACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT |
|
Status: |
03/09/2009 – Senate Committee On State and Local
Government |
|
Position: |
Oppose |
|
Category: |
Priority Goal |
|
Comments: |
This bill clarifies that a local government may not
impose a tax, fee or monetary contribution for developments that is not
specifically authorized by law. This bill would essentially impact a
county's ability to impose an adequate public facilities ordinance (APFO)
if fees are involved. A similar bill passed the Senate in 2007 but did
not pass the House. |
|
Bill: |
SB487 |
|
Sponsors: |
Clodfelter (D37) |
|
Title: |
MODERNIZE SALES TAX STAT/DIGITAL PRODUCTS |
|
Status: |
03/10/2009 – Senate Committee On Finance |
|
Position: |
Support |
|
Category: |
Legislative Goal |
|
Comments: |
This bill clarifies that music, movies, books and
computer software that are purchased and delivered electronically are
subject to the same sales tax as if they were purchased in a hard
format. The bill would become effective Jan. 1, 2010. The NCACC Board of
Directors, at its Feb. 18, 2009, meeting, adopted a federal legislative
goal to "Support Remote Sales Tax Collection." North Carolina is one of
19 states that are in full compliance with the Streamlined Sales and Use
Tax Agreement, according to the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board,
Inc. |
|